Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Who are the Pakistani Taliban?

Who are the Pakistani Taliban?


Watch this video

Who Are the Pakistan Taliban?

The Pakistani Taliban is a banned Islamist group with intimate links with the Afghan Taliban and al Qaeda.
While the attempted killing of 14-year-old teen activist Malala Yousafzai has brought renewed focus on the group, the brazen act is part of a long list of attacks on civilians and the military that the Islamist militant group has carried out in Pakistan's mostly ungoverned tribal area along the Afghan border.
Most recently, the group, formally known as Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), took the global spotlight when Faisal Shahzad, a Pakistani-American, attempted to detonate a car bomb in New York's Times Square in May 2010. The TTP took responsibility, and Shahzad testified that he had received training from them.
The following September, the U.S. State Department designated the TTP a Foreign Terrorist Organization.
Malala's recovery after Taliban attack
Malala's friend: No regrets
Are they "the Taliban?"
They are not "the Taliban" that the U.S. forces have been at war with in Afghanistan, according to a Pakistani analyst. But adopting the name "Taliban" is no coincidence.
Formally known as Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, the group is intimately linked with its namesake in Afghanistan as well as with al Qaeda. It shares its religious extremist ideology -- but is its own distinct group.
The groups also have a different goal, but its tactics are the same, says Raza Rumi, director of policy and programs at the Jinnah Institute, a Pakistani think tank.
"Their primary target is the Pakistani state and its military," he says. "It resents the fact that it (Pakistan) has an alliance with the West, and it wants sharia to be imposed in Pakistan."
Where do the TTP's roots lie?
Pakistan's army began hunting various militant groups in the semi-autonomous regions along Pakistan's border with Afghanistan known as the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) in 2002.
In reaction, militant "supporters of the Afghan Taliban in the tribal areas transitioned into a mainstream Taliban force of their own," according to the Council on Foreign Relations.
During the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, fighters from Pakistan crossed over the border to fight. They retained close relations with the Taliban after returning home, Rumi says.
In 2007, like-minded militias in Pakistan's triabl region came together under the command of Baitullah Mehsud.
As a result of its beginnings, Tehrik-i-Taliban is not a unified fighting force but a coordinated coalition of militias.
A U.S. drone strike took Mehsud's life in 2009.
The militant groups control different regions within the tribal area and often have different agendas and political objectives. The factions don't always speak with one voice, although it is widely believed they recognize Hakimullah Mehsud as their leader since Mehsud's death.
They are "not just guys hiding in mountains or caves," with loose factions having spread as far as Punjab province, Rumi explains.
"And they have also been joined by criminal gangs" to raise money through kidnappings and extortion. But the TTP has maintained the coalition nature of their roots.
"There is a lot of discord," says Rumi, "but for the moment they are all united."
Their opposition to the government and its allies has galvanized them.
"When (former president) Musharraf sided with the US in 2001 after the 'you are either with us or against us' line from (then-President George W.) Bush, this is when the Taliban began to resent the military," Rumi says.
The TTP does not encompass all militant groups in the tribal regions but does work together with some, such as the Haqqani Network.
What is the Pakistani Taliban's mission?
The TTP is fighting to overthrow Pakistan's government via a terrorist campaign, according to the U.S. State Department.
"They reject the Pakistani constitution," says Rumi. "They reject the democratic process in Pakistan."
Because of Pakistan's alliances with the United States and other countries, the Pakistani Taliban also attacks foreign interests in and outside of Pakistan.
Within Pakistan, Tehrik-i-Taliban often targets members of Pakistan's armed forces but also kills civilians for political and religious reasons. In a December 2009 bombing of a mosque frequented by Pakistani military personnel, the group killed 36 and wounded 75.
In March 2011, a TTP bomb planted at a natural gas station killed dozens.
An attack on a Sufi shrine in April 2011 killed more that 50 in Dera Ghazi Khan, the U.S. State Department said, which also suspects the group may have been involved in the killing of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto in 2007.
Assaults on U.S. and other foreign interests have included attacks on a military base in Afghanistan and a U.S. Consulate in Peshawar. The TTP has also claimed responsibility for the assassination of a Saudi Arabian diplomat.
"Their ambitions are linked to the agenda of al Qaeda," says Rumi. They would like to bring down the West and the United States, but "given their capacity and network, they are overreaching."
Why the May 2010 Times Square bombing attempt?
Since the United States is not in a state of war with Pakistan, its military does not pursue the Pakistani Taliban within that country's borders.
Instead the CIA has hammered the TTP and other targets in the tribal regions with drone strikes, which have inflicted heavy losses but not stamped it out.
The New York City bombing attempt has been interpreted by some as an act of revenge.
The TTP's leader, Hakimullah Mehsud, recorded an audio message in April 2010 with a warning to the United States: "From now on the main targets of our fedayeen (fighters) are American cities."
Who within the Pakistani Taliban targeted the teenage blogger?
A Tehrik-i-Taliban militia led by Maulana Fazlullah once controlled the Swat region, Malala's home. Pakistan's interior minister blames it for the assassination attempt and has announced a bounty of $1 million on the heads of those responsible.
In an odd twist, the Pakistani military ran Fazlullah's group out of Pakistan in 2009, forcing it to operate in Afghanistan, where the U.S. military can openly pursue it.
Why is the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan so difficult to fight?
The Pakistani military has been at this for a long time, Rumi points out, and although there have been successes, the fight drags on.
"The impetus from the Taliban type of movement is the fight against the military," he says. Fighting them is what caused them to form in the first place. De-escalation should be part of the solution.
"The timely exit of the U.S. forces from Afghanistan is so important not only for Afghanistan but for Pakistan as well," Rumi says.
How should the government respond?
Rumi recommends a "holistic strategy, which includes military, political and institutional solutions." In the end, the people of the tribal regions need to be re-integrated into Pakistani society.
But he does not expect to see much an increase in military action against the TTP soon.
"This is an election year," he says, "so no political party would want to be seen as being creating more destruction and war."

4

Health - Is chocolate a healthy food choice? Download Video Download Audio iTunes Video Podcast Oct. 12, 2012 What should Christians base their dietary choices on? The Bible? The latest research? This week Peter Landless explains how the principle of moderation can play a role. The question is always asked, “What is good for me to eat?” “What can I enjoy?” “If I enjoy it, it is obviously not good for me or it is fattening.” We have heard that so often, well the question comes up, what about chocolate? Chocolate is it good for me? Should I eat it? Should I enjoy it? Well, people are saying, “There are these studies which say,” and you know that some of the studies which were done, were done on fourteen people only. So that is not a huge amount of numbers to look at, but the evidence is beginning to mount more and more that a little bit of chocolate may be good for you. Now notice what I said, a little bit of chocolate. Why would chocolate, perhaps be good for you? Well it is filled with phytochemicals and antioxidants, those are the good things that work to promote good health in our bodies. However, you need to remember that however healthy that may be, chocolate has CALORIES, it has SUGAR, it has FAT in it so all of those lead to one conclusion, if you do eat it, make sure that you eat small amounts. You see, that is the whole point, moderation and enjoyment of things that are good in small quantities and chocolate is one of those. So, should you eat it? If you choose to, you can, make sure that you eat it in small quantities, and that it doesn’t take up the room for your other discretionary calories that good foods can fill up as well.

Health - Is chocolate a healthy food choice?

The question is always asked, “What is good for me to eat?” “What can I enjoy?”  “If I enjoy it, it is obviously not good for me or it is fattening.”  We have heard that so often, well the question comes up, what about chocolate?  Chocolate is it good for me?  Should I eat it? Should I enjoy it? Well, people are saying, “There are these studies which say,” and you know that some of the studies which were done, were done on fourteen people only.  So that is not a huge amount of numbers to look at, but the evidence is beginning to mount more and more that a little bit of chocolate may be good for you.  Now notice what I said, a little bit of chocolate.  Why would chocolate, perhaps be good for you?  Well it is filled with phytochemicals and antioxidants, those are the good things that work to promote good health in our bodies.
However, you need to remember that however healthy that may be, chocolate has CALORIES, it has SUGAR, it has FAT in it so all of those lead to one conclusion, if you do eat it, make sure that you eat small amounts.  You see, that is the whole point, moderation and enjoyment of things that are good in small quantities and chocolate is one of those.  So, should you eat it?  If you choose to, you can, make sure that you eat it in small quantities, and that it doesn’t take up the room for your other discretionary calories that good foods can fill up as well.

Health - Are you drinking enough water?

Health - Are you drinking enough water?

Are you drinking enough water, especially in hot weather or during exercise? As Peter Landless says, you can’t always depend on feeling thirsty.
How much water should we drink?  That’s a question which people often ask, should it be six glasses, eight glasses, does everything that I eat count?  Watermelon, fruit, soups?  Well yes it does, it all counts but is extremely difficult to go and count every glass of water.  So, we have two things, we have a wonderful thirst mechanism which tells you that when you are walking around with your bottle of water that you know weather or not you need to drink, you don’t need to sort of drink every five minutes, every two minutes but you do need to drink to quench your thirst.  Number one, always your quench your thirst and then take a third extra beyond that.  The second important test – when you are wanting to know how much water to drink, especially when you exercise, especially when it’s hot, especially when you are perspiring, then you need another test.  First one was your thirst, the second one is what color is your urine?  If the urine is a nice clear color, approaching the color of tap water, you know that you are drinking enough water.  And so you have some tests, we so often go without what is really one of the huge essentials of life and that is adequate amounts of water.  Make sure that you don’t make that mistake.  Quench your thirst, add a third of volume, over and above that is taken and check the color of your urine.

After debate, Annual Council votes Statement on Church Polity

Oct. 16, 2012 Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
Mark A. Kellner/Adventist Review, and Edwin Manuel Garcia/ANN
Following three hours of respectful study and discussion, leaders of the Seventh-day Adventist world church voted to approve a “Statement on Church Polity, Procedures and Resolution of Disagreements in the Light of Recent Union Actions on Ministerial Ordination” on October 16, during the Annual Council of world church leaders held in Silver Spring, Maryland, United States.
The vote was 264 in favor and 25 opposed.

The move comes after three local unions – the North German Union in the Euro-Africa Division, and the Columbia Union and Pacific Union in the North American Division – separately voted this year to permit ordination “without respect to gender,” something the Adventist Church as a whole has twice rejected in votes at the movement’s General Conference Sessions, which are held every five years.
The voted statement expresses disapproval of the independent actions of the unions, appeals for all Church units “to consider thoughtfully the impact and implications of decisions” made independently of the world community, and affirms the role of women in the Church’s life and ministry. The document also points toward continuing studies on the theology of ordination, the results of which are expected to be ready in 2014, ahead of the following year’s 60th General Conference Session. No sanctions are applied, or suggested, in the document.
“This statement deals with Church structure and procedures. It does not address the question of ministerial ordination practices per se,” the statement said. “The central issue is one of Church polity – how the Church defines its organization, governance and operations.”
“Decisions to pursue a course of action not in harmony with the 1990 and 1995 General Conference Session decisions (with respect to ministerial ordination) represent not only an expression of dissent but also a demonstration of self-determination in a matter previously decided by the collective Church,” the statement said. “The General Conference Executive Committee regards these actions as serious mistakes.”
The statement text continues, “The world Church cannot legitimize practices that clearly contradict the intent of General Conference Session actions.  … Accordingly, the world Church does not recognize the actions of unions or conferences that have authorized or implemented ministerial ordination without regard to gender.”
But the statement is also clear in stating the Seventh-day Adventist Church’s position on women: “The General Conference Executive Committee specifically affirms the important roles that women fill in the life of the Church. Their giftedness and commitment is a blessing to the whole Church and a necessary part of its work in mission.”
The measure passed on a secret, paper ballot after the day's discussion, which began with comments from Pastor Ted N. C. Wilson, Seventh-day Adventist world church president. Wilson expressed the hope that the world church's units would continue "focusing on the mission of the Church, uniting in Christ, even though we will face some differences and disagreements."
Wilson was followed by noted evangelist and retired General Conference vice president Pastor Mark Finley, who spoke about the question of how the early church made decisions and worked in unity. He referenced three incidents in the book of Acts.

"The essence of unity is not uniform action; it is respecting one another enough to listen carefully, respond thoughtfully and decide together," Finley said. "Insurmountable difficulties were resolved as early church leaders met together, prayed and surrendered their personal opinions to the decision of the larger corporate body."
During an extended comment period, Pastor Daniel Jackson, North American Division president, sought to reassure world church leaders that the division supported the Church's mission, despite the polity question discussed in the statement.
"We want to make it abundantly clear that the NAD without any hesitation expresses our unity with the world church," Jackson said. "We are not just an adjunct to the world church; we are brothers and sisters with every person in this room."
A pastor in the NAD’s Atlantic Union Conference, Dedrick Blue, told his fellow delegates that “the process deals with the mechanism, but the effect is just as important as the process. What we are grappling with here is the effect of our decision as a world body,” adding, “Don't get involved with process to neglect justice and mercy.”
While he voted in favor of the statement, Northwest Pacific Union Conference president Pastor Max Torkelson II said he hoped younger Adventists wouldn’t get the wrong message from the action. He spoke with a reporter following the meeting.
“I’m concerned that, particularly our younger church members have less patience” to wait for the world church to act, he said. “And we’re asking them, we have been asking them, for years, to be patient, and now again we’re asking them to be patient. I admire them to the degree that they are, but I’m wondering how long we can presume that they will be patient. I’m afraid that we may disappoint them.”
Following the vote and before prayers by Adventist university leaders from three continents, Wilson said he appreciated delegates’ careful approach to the matter.
“Thank you for your confidence in the power of the Holy Spirit to bring unity to God's Church,” Wilson said. “We're not at the end of the road, we still have a journey to complete, but by God's grace, let's do it together.”